Posts Tagged BNP
Jumping the gun…
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in News, Social Discourse on July 26, 2011
It has been a bit of a while since my last post – not that there hasn’t been plenty of things to potentially write about. However I felt I had to shake myself out of my slumber to write something on the recent tragedy in Camden Square Norway, and the madness of gunman Anders Behring Breivik. Read the rest of this entry »
Silliness
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in Everyday, News on May 21, 2010
A number of stories I have read recently have made me chuckle. Whenever I hear some politically correct bleater I’d usually want to give them a sharp clip around the ear, but I suppose the best thing you can do is just laugh and revel in their witless stupidity. Read the rest of this entry »
Immigration
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in News, Social Discourse on February 25, 2010
Immigration is a topic that has been hot on the agenda for a long time, but is something that has leapt to new levels in the past decade. Following the admission of a number of Eastern European countries in to the European Union armies of people seeking their fortunes have legally headed to these shores, with numbers bolstered further by the influx of tens of thousands of illegals from elsewhere.
It is such a vexed issue that those debating it will more often than not be clouded by their own rhetorical Weltanschauung; it is a subject capable of creating anything from an emotional debate through to heated antagonism and, at the sharp end of the scale, outright violence.
The issue is far from simple; if it were so I am certain that a solution would have been pretty well nailed down by now. It is easy for those on the left to condemn everyone who may harbour reservations about certain newcomers as “Daily Mail readers” in much as the same way as it is for those of us on the right to describe those on the other side of the fence as Guardian-reading Islingtonistas; the truth is that with all of the theorising and bickering across the political divide, the ability to apply any sort of common sense has been lost.
There are no black and white issues here – many newcomers have proved to be of great benefit to this country and its economy while large numbers of others have proved to be little more than a criminal burden and a drain on resources. The problem of course is that while the left continually harp on about the success stories while at the same time ignoring the problems experienced in our crowded neighbourhoods, the tub-thumpers of the Daily Mail will witter on about problems in Dover while ignoring those wonderful stories of the Polish plumber answering an emergency call in the middle of the night without demanding an exhorbitant out of hours callout charge.
The hacks like to keep things simple, only because it helps them generate the same old headlines – all of which are bunk. The truth is that while the Guardianistas are happy to regale us plebs with their fluffy and wonderful multi-kulti vision, they will more often than not return after work every evening to their whiter than white neighbourhoods, comfortable ivory towers light years away from the crowded inner cities. Meanwhile, those who eagerly lap up the ridiculous notion that “immigrants are stealing our jobs” would never consider doing the same thing for even double the money.
Of course, to draw any lines of demarcation would result in accusations of pigeon-holing and – perish the thought – “racism”; it is far easier to on the one hand describe every newcomer as either wonderful – or, if things don’t add up, “culturally different” – while on the other hand dismiss them all as equally horrid. It is a case of “let them all in” or “kick them all out”, with no common sense in-between.
I personally have no problem with immigration per se, provided that it makes economic sense. Truth be told, if I were an employer and needed to find a dozen people to engage in hard work I would post up a notice at the local Polish delicatessen. In doing this I would be confident that the people I get would turn up on time, do their job properly and not be wanting a tea and fag break every ten minutes. I could on the other hand advertise the positions at the Job Centre, only to be burdened with a bunch of lazyboneses whose idea of hard work is turning up late, complaining about the job or quitting before they have even started. By the same token, I wouldn’t attempt to hire a dozen Muslim Iraqis or Afghans, as they’d probably spend most of their time looking towards Mecca or complaining that they weren’t being offered a Halal option for lunch.
Racism, prejudice, call it what you will – as far as I am concerned any decision I might make would be driven by basic economic sense – and this should be the case across the entire country. Businesses should be allowed to function in a way that allows them to become successful cogs of the ecomony as a whole; they should not need to subsidise lazy workers, bend over backwards to meet ridiculous cultural demands or have to defer deadlines on account of the staff not being up to scratch.
The problems we are facing in this country have little or nothing to do with hard-working newcomers “taking away” jobs from local people who for the most part would rather be claiming benefit and vegetating a home all day in front of the Jeremy Kyle Show; take the newcomers away and you’d just have a host of failed businesses and an even larger number of unemployed locals. Meanwhile, the indolent would still be spending their (sorry, our) money on widescreen televisions, ugly jewellery, cigarettes, cheap alcohol and drugs. The benefits system has much to answer for, in that it has helped to create a generation of work-shy, lazy, useless morlocks whose only real aim in life is to breed.
As for the problems caused by immigration – as far as I am concerned at least – these will not be found in fields populated by hard-working labourers from the new EU countries. These problems can be seen in our inner cities, many of which have become little more than ghettos for people that can best be described as culturally insular interlopers. They can be seen on the streets of towns like Dover, parts of which have become encampments for armies of wandering Balkan gypsies. They can be seen in towns populated by Muslims whose desire is not to blend in with the British way of life but instead create their own little Islamic urban statelets, complete with hideous mosques, unhygienic halal butcheries and the implementation of Sharia Law.
Why the government cannot understand that there is a glaringly obvious difference between a Slovak or Polish asparagus picker and a so-called criminal “refugee” from Kosovo (read: Albania) or a mediaeval wife- and daughter-beater from Kurdistan continues to leave me scratching my head in confusion.
In a perfect world, I’d take all of the foreign interlopers on the first boat back from when they came. I’d then ship out all of our home-grown lazybonses and put them on a desert island so that they can vegetate in peace without us having to pay for them. This would solve the immigration problem in one stroke and render one-issue parties like the BNP redundant – doubly so given that most of support base would be amongst those foraging for berries on said desert island. I’d then invite a group of Poles to open up a traditional restaurant at the end of my street, where they’d serve a range of dishes – none of which would be Halal. In fact, let’s have a Hungarian restaurant too – I haven’t had a decent gulasz since my last trip to Budapest.
Hain the pain
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in Everyday, News, Social Discourse on October 19, 2009
Sometimes I wonder why some people just cannot shut up and crawl back into their little holes. Nope, on this occasion I am not talking about BNP leader Nick Griffin, but Welsh Secretary and serial meddler Peter Hain.
Most of us who read or listen to the news will know about the decision to invite Nick Griffin – or rather, Nick Griffin MEP – onto the BBC current affair panel programme Question Time. And most of us would be more than aware of the shitstorm this has all created, from the now rather tiresome hand-wringing of some MPs through to threats of violence and disorder from the group that calls itself “Unite Against Fascism” (UAF).

Peter Hain, proud defender of free speech...
Now Hain has threatened to launch his own legal campaign against the BBC for inviting Griffin onto the show – when he should be getting on with his job and not wasting his own and everybody else’s time. (A copy of the letter itself can be found here).
I frankly cannot see why this has caused such a rumpus – Griffin is an elected MEP and, whether Peter Hain and his ilk like it or not, the BNP are now part of the democratic landscape of this country; as such he and his colleagues should concentrate on debating the issues at hand rather than chasing their own little bogeyman in order to make themselves feel better.
The BNP core leadership may be an odious lot in that their history can be traced back to various unsavoury groups; this cannot be said for many who might have voted for them on the other hand – in the main ordinary British people who have seen successive Governments do sweet bugger all for them and their families, while at the same time turning a blind eye to the steady flow of newcomers and the rise of fundamentalist Islam. It doesn’t take a genius to understand that there is clearly a political vacuum here, and that the BNP have very successfully worked to fill it.
The political establishment don’t appear to have learned nothing from history: in the mid to late 1970s this country was seriously under threat from the National Front (a party far more extreme and uncouth than the BNP), and in some cases there was a very real fear that the NF could have gained a significant foothold in the British political arena. The left simply stoked the flames, whipping up hysteria in a society that was arguably on the brink: had the Labour Party – then dominated by the left – won the general election in 1979, we would have witnessed mass carnage in this country. The inner cities would have imploded, and the white working class would have jumped blindly for the tub-thumping rhetoric of the NF.
As it happened, the Thatcher revolution was about to begin – and with it a more coherent, common-sense approach that didn’t aim to smash the NF but slowly strangle it. By the time Mrs. Thatcher was relected in 1983, the NF were back again on the fringes of society and consigned to the terraces at some football grounds. By the late 1980s, even this phenomenon was slowly being snuffed out.
Less than two decades after the end of the Thatcher era, we have come full circle – the main difference this time is that the Conservative party, rather than being the voice of reason and common sense, are now part of the happy-clappy, multi-kulti, whateveryouwanttobe-friendly establishment. Even David Cameron, keen to promote his new-found political mission, is a member of UAF. It’s just laughable – twenty years ago any Conservative worth his or her salt would not have been seen dead standing alongside this rabble.
The political vacuum that exists today is down to the simple fact that politicians are more remote than they have ever been; with their own little scams, fiddling their expenses and living in their own little media bubbles many of them have no real idea how things have changed for the British public in the past two decades. They’d immediately dismiss it as my being paranoid, but when I go shopping these days every third person I encounter cannot speak English properly – on one occasion when asking where to find something at a supermarket I received little more than a series of incoherent grunts. Of course, to even dare to suggest that applicants for this person’s job should be able to speak English properly would be seen by some as “racist” – or something.
This is just the sort of situation that gives the BNP its credibility – and no amount of legal posturing or placard-waving is going to change anything. For what it’s worth, I happen to find Peter Hain offensive – is anyone going to support me in launching a legal campaign the next time he makes an appearance on Question Time? Erm, right.
Unite Against Foolishness
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in News, Social Discourse on October 13, 2009
Yet again the British National Party make their way into the news when they should have been left to trot along, but those who have only served to make their case stronger seem intent on magnifying what is, in truth, a minor issue.
Yes, the curiously named group Unite Against Fascism – a sorry bunch of misfits that is only united in their desire to cause trouble and has far more fascistic tendencies than the poor old BNP – are at it again in their childish attempts to keep BNP leader Nick Griffin away from the BBC studios for his scheduled appearance on the BBC’s Question Time.
As a general rule, Question Time – screened late on a Thursday evening usually while something arguably more gripping is on another one of the myriad of available television and satellite channels – has had a loyal and probably limited viewership; however, both UAF and this bunch of dingbats we have for a Government have only served to make this edition of the programme a must-see and, irony of ironies – a wonderful publicity coup for Griffin and his ragtag political party.
What I cannot understand is why the Government are making out that they are being shoehorned into this discussion – they have made it perfectly clear that not sending a representative would mean an embarrassingly empty Labour Party seat on the panel, and that the only alternative is to allow their arm to be twisted by the BBC. Two of Labour’s senior apparatchiks, Comrades Peter Hain and Alan Johnson, have made no bones about their unwillingness to sit on a panel with Griffin.
I find this position absurd: if the Labour Party is confident about its stance, then it should meet its adversaries head on in a fair and open debate. The fact that they have continually tried to worm out of it says more about them and their crisis of confidence than it says about the BNP.
Quite simply – and I have stated it before – the BNP are a single issue party, and you don’t even need to discuss the most controversially obvious issues to send them scuttling back to the corner with the dunce’s cap. I would simply put them head to head with an economic expert and watch them squirm as they are asked to elaborate on an economic policy that would make your average Khmer Rouge veteran blush.
The leftist activists who have made it an issue to prevent democratically-elected politicians from entering television studios are, however, the most odious lot of all. For all their posturing and placard-waving, they cannot see that it is they if anybody who are leading the charge against the democratic process. I’d suggest that instead of spending time painting placards, barricading streets and wasting everybody’s time – and taxpayers’ money – they should get a job.
For the left, it has always been the case that free and open debate is fine so long as you agree with them.
The rise and fall of Billy Brit
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in News, Social Discourse on June 16, 2009
Some of you may have heard about Billy Brit, most of you have probably not. For the majority of the British public, their first encounter with this wonderfully twee yet disturbing character would have been on the popular late-evening BBC television show Have I Got News For You, where he made his debut national television appearance.
So, who is Billy Brit? A comedian? A reality TV “star”? Gordon Brown’s campaign manager? Nope. Billy Brit is a rather odd-looking puppet, the former star of the quickly put together website of the youth wing of the British National Party, or YBNP. I say “former” star – more on that in a bit.
Following the puppet’s appearance on HIGNFY the BNP were quick to play to the gallery, stating how “proud” they were that their lad Billy had made an appearance on the show, a staple for politics-watchers on both the left and right.
Unfortunately for the BNP, this opportunistic attempt to generate publicity only served to open them up to yet further ridicule. The voice of Billy was clearly that of a grown man putting on a curious falsetto voice, the result of which sounded like a castrated sheep: wonderfully toe-curling, Billy’s style and delivery reminded one of those cheaply-made children’s programmes from the 1970s as he wittered on about the heroic Boudicca taking on the horrible Romans.
What was even funnier however was that the puppet marketed as “Billy Brit” was not even a British original, but a bog-standard puppet ordered from an online store. Rather than being born and raised in Burnley or Dagenham, it is more likely that Billy was probably made in some sweatshop somewhere south of Beijing, which would have meant that the poor fellow was promoting a party who if they really studied his origins would probably have been less than welcoming.
It goes to show what a laugh these guys really are, and that the best way to deal with them is not by throwing around witless slurs or eggs, but by allowing them to simply try and get on with things and watch with a grin as the wheels start falling off.
Of course when poor old Billy’s (or is that Hu Flung Dung’s?) origins were exposed, the BNP’s enemies were quick to make capital out of it. They got their orders in for the “Billy” puppet, and created some marvellous spoofs of the original propaganda skits that were posted on YouTube and linked from the YBNP website.
Now it is very unlikely that I share many of the political convictions who those who took the time to create the spoofed “Billy Brit” videos, but they are funny all the same. The best is one featuring the infamous Euro election campaign leaflet – yep, the leaflet with the made up quotes and pictures of American actors and models rebadged as “British workers”. lol.
This potential PR disaster led the fellows with their hands up Billy’s behind to conclude that it was all not such a good idea after all, resulting in their pulling all of their YouTube videos. Which is a shame, for as well as being historically inaccurate they are also rather funny, though in a macabre sense. Billy has no doubt been sacked, left to fend for himself with his fellow countrymen.
Let’s just hope he hasn’t been forced into taking up a job picking cockles.
Saturday morning press scour…
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in Everyday, News, Social Discourse on June 13, 2009
Maybe it’s hope, maybe some people are reading this blog and taking note, but today I was pleased to see that some mainstream journalists have offered similar comments on two otherwise disparate stories I touched on this week.
First there was an excellent analysis of the election of the BNP and the issue of immigration by Max Hastings, a man whom in my opinion should be writing for something better than the Daily Mail. To see his cogent, well-written items sitting alongside the lurid sensationalism of the likes of Peter Allen and Melanie Phillips or the lastest on the goings on the Big Brother house is a little disconcerting.
Hastings alludes to the issue I pointed out last week – namely that the clear blue water that used to sit between Labour and the Conservatives has drained away, there is little in the way of real choice, and that there is – in effect – no genuine opposition to current Government policy:
The main parties, and especially the Tories, believe that by saying little or nothing about immigration, they escape the charge from the Left that they are promoting racial hatred, going back to their bad old Powellite ways.
Instead, however, there seems a powerful argument that they are thus failing in their duty as an opposition, to lay bare the failure of government policy.
If I were in David Cameron’s office right now I would do well to heed this honest advice, otherwise come the next European Elections the BNP will end up with half a dozen seats as questions continue to remain unanswered and issues that are fundamental to the stability of this country continue to remain unaddressed.
Then there is an equally good piece on the fecklessless of modern sportsmen by Amanda Platell, who touches upon the likes of overpaid primadonnas Cristiano Ronaldo and David Beckham and compares them with the less-heralded but far more valuable Sir Chris Hoy.
Platell writes:
…what troubles me is the message these mega-millions send to the young and impressionable.
For as Ronaldo and Beckham show, sporting ‘achievement’ these days is measured far more by monetary value and celebrity than by true sportsmanship.Put aside Ronaldo’s ball skills and what do we have? A preening, metrosexual playboy who won’t leave home without his fake tan.
I couldn’t have put it better myself.
Today, June 13th, is also the 65th anniversary of the battle at Villers Bocage. Though in spite of what I might have told Tom Harper about this event I doubt anyone will be mentioning it, even though it has been hilarious described as the scene of a “massacre”. I guess that there’s no real mileage in this otherwise boring event to make the grade as a Daily Mail Nazi Story of the Week…
“A bad day for democracy?”
Posted by Grand Méchant Loup in News, Social Discourse on June 9, 2009
Many spokespersons from the mainstream parties have described the British National Party (BNP) winning two seats in the recent European election “a bad day for democracy”. I however am not so sure.
I have spoken at length about the BNP and its core support base – and the policies crafted and engineered to appeal to that support base. None of these are remotely “right-wing” in the traditional sense. I’d wager that the armies of journalists babbling about the BNP haven’t even examined that party’s policies – and noted the clear and obvious fact that most of them are mirrored by those equally one-dimensional movements on the far left of the political spectrum. In fact, the only policy that can be described as remotely “right-wing” is their position on immigration.
The truth is that a particular section of voters – those who could be described as traditional supporters of “old” Labour – have switched their support from an internationalist socialist party to a nationalist one: the BNP’s position on welfare, the economy, nationalisation and state control are little or no different from the red rabble that were pounding the streets during the 1930s. As a result, the bottom has fallen out of Labour’s traditional voter base. Whether this is a one-off or the beginning of a more pronounced trend will not be determined by the BNP themselves, but by the mainstream parties who now need to take stock of the situation and attempt to understand how we have got to this stage.
So, was the BNP winning its two seats a bad day for democracy? My answer would be a resounding no. For in gaining its two MEPs, the anger and discontent directed at the political mainstream – previously ignored – was delivered with a resounding hammer blow. With Nick Griffin and his colleague Andrew Brons now preparing to take their seats in the European Parliament, it should be blindingly obvious to the mainstream parties that issues that have been left to fester over the last ten years need to be addressed. Over the last decade the Labour Party has, in its attempt to secure the middle-class vote, has moved steadily to the right; meanwhile, a Conservative Party foolishly desperate to shed itself of the Thatcherite legacy and accusations of being the “nasty party” has moved westwards.
The net result is that the clear blue water that existed during the 1980s has been drained away, leaving a rather unhealthy situation of there being two large mainstream parties that are in truth and deed little different from each other. For a democracy to truly work, there needs to be some obvious degree of choice: given that there is little apparent difference between Brown’s Labour Party and Cameron’s Conservatives, the appeal of a hard-talking party like the BNP is easy to understand.
Yes, the BNP is essentially a “racist” party in that its membership requirements are unashamedly exclusivist. However, this does not mean that many of those who may have voted for them are in any way racist – rather, they are people who desperately want to make themselves heard but have no genuine outlet. For one, I feel that the term “racist” has been much abused in that it has often been used as a club by bleeding-hearted politicians, politically-correct hacks and mischievous journalists to beat those people whose views they don’t like; common sense has been thrown out of the window, and in many respects the lunatics have taken over the asylum. And it is in the dark, dank corners of the asylum where fungus of extremism often grows.
A democracy is healthy only when the people are offered a reasonable selection of alternatives. I’d rather have a system with the BNP in it than one where there are two parties that are essentially the same; it can be argued that their presence of those on the fringe provides some sort of political barometer, a genuine gauge of what the public are actually thinking. It is also far better to have the political extremes in clear view than ostracised, banned and driven underground.
The aim should be not to tell people who or who not to vote for or to outlaw those with views and opinions one may not approve of, but to make one’s political opponent as unappealing as possible – not through bleating about them or what their leader’s great-grandfather might have said in 1934, but through the promotion of a cogent, principled alternative. Winning votes is important, but it should never be placed ahead of principle and conviction; whatever their political hue, people respect candour and honesty – and the dearth of such principles among mainstream politicians is but further ammunition to the likes of the BNP. It’s all about respecting the views of the electorate and claiming the higher moral ground: by combatting an opponent by engaging in the journalistic dark arts, an advantage that might otherwise have been easily secured is very quickly lost.
Of course, in a perfect world there would be no BNP at all – there would be a Labour Party that stands for its core support and a Conservative Party that is genuinely conservative.
